🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to erase Black history and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.